Communications Interoperability Markets and Technology Forecast - 2008-2012
According to the market research report Communications Interoperability Markets and Technology Forecast - 2008-2012 released by the Homeland Security Research Corporation
the $73B market promises to become one of the fastest growing sectors in homeland security.
|
Eight Big U.S. Cities are Communications Interoperability Nightmare
|
According to the report released by the Department of Homeland Security eight big U.S. cities with total population of 11 mln can become interoperability nightmare in emergency situation. If we assume that the total score level lower than 0.6 reflects extremely low level of interoperability, we have a very gloomy picture. On the other side these data show where where business opportunities are in upgrading communication systems and training first responders.
The January 2007 scorecards measured communities' progress in achieving tactical communications interoperability in three broad areas:
- their strategic plan to coordinate emergency services across different jurisdictions;
- their standard disaster response policies, technology and procedures;
- their training exercises under simulated crisis conditions.
| Area | Governance | SOP | Usage | Average Score | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Diego, CA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Twin Cities, MN | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| National Capital Region | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Columbus, OH | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Sioux Falls (South Dakota) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Laramie County (Wyoming) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Long Beach, CA | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.92 | |
| Los Angeles, CA | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.92 | |
| San Jose, CA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.92 | |
| Las Vegas, NV | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.92 | |
| Anaheim, CA | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.83 | |
| Oakland, CA | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | |
| Santa Ana, CA | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.83 | |
| Jacksonville, FL | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | |
| Miami, FL | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | |
| Anchorage (Alaska) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | |
| Little Rock (Arkansas) | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.83 | |
| Ada County (Idaho) | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.83 | |
| Topeka (Kansas) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | |
| Portland (Maine) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | |
| Sacramento, CA | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Atlanta, GA | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | |
| New Orleans, LA | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 | |
| Baltimore, MD | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Boston, MA | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Kansas City, MO | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Jersey City, NJ | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Newark, NJ | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| New York City, NY | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Birmingham (Alabama) | 0.50 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | |
| Wilmington (Delaware) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Concord (New Hampshire) | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Salt Lake City (Utah) | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| Phoenix, AZ | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Denver, CO | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Tampa Bay, FL | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.67 | |
| Indianapolis, IN | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Buffalo, NY | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Charlotte, NC | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Houston, TX | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Seattle, WA | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Connecticut Region 1 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Charleston (South Carolina) | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| Morgantown (West Virginia) | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.67 | |
| San Francisco, CA | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 739,426 |
| Honolulu, HI | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.58 | |
| Louisville, KY | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 556,429 |
| St. Louis, MO | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.58 | |
| Omaha, NE | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 414,521 |
| Central Oklahoma, OK | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 531,324 |
| Portland, OR | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.58 | 533,427 |
| Philadelphia, PA | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 1,463,281 |
| San Antonio, TX | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.58 | |
| Milwaukee, WI | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.58 | |
| Nashville (Tennessee) | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.58 | |
| Northeast Quadrant (Vermont) | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.58 | |
| Guam | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.58 | |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.58 | |
| U.S. Virgin Islands | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.58 | |
| Detroit, MI | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 886,671 |
| Cincinnati, OH | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| Toledo, OH | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| Dallas/Fort Worth, TX | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1,837,000 |
| Ottumwa (Iowa) | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| Jackson (Mississippi) | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| Albuquerque (New Mexico) | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 494,236 |
| Providence (Rhode Island) | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.50 | |
| Puerto Rico | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
| Chicago, IL | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 2,842,518 |
| Baton Rouge, LA | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.42 | |
| Cleveland, OH | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 452,208 |
| Yellowstone County (Montana) | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.42 | |
| Mandan (North Dakota) | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.42 | |
| American Samoa | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.33 | |
| 10,751,041 |